THE TRUTH ABOUT OUR UNIVERSE how it really works

UNIVERSE ROD KAWECKI


    Our universe description can be explained as looking like a liter chunk of matter in the origin of a planetary land....laying on top of water in a lake. The universe is big very big. Like Earth this matter I call land .. we live on .. is surrounded by water or space like we see the stars at nite. The earth exist of over 90 % percent water in comparison as empty space in the cosmos universe. This land or chunks we know as planets and stars sit in an empty type of space. An allusive empty spread of a fabric whose elements are yet known to us on the element chart. We have a long ways to go. All the matter in the cosmos was once a single chunk which over time broke  spread into smaller pieces. Explosions occured chunks of matter was settled all around in an empty portion of space.
  The material we observe as matter all came from decay in an explosion that occured in the first beginning we know as the big bang event. Everything that exist today in the universe came from first light the big bang. First Light came to exist afterwards and the orgin of life came a multiple eons later.
   Over time as the universe continued to expand getting bigger and bigger existing matter that was formed from first light settling on top of an expanding fabric and its surface.  Laying deep within the fabric matter assumed breaking into smaller joints we know these smaller chunks of matter as galaxies. At the center of all the galaxies lays a black hole from which the matter has errupted that occured from at its earliest time. As a infinitely dense material the matter exploded having come from a earlier more dense bang galactic bangs are the aftermath of the first singularity the first bang. Its content from earliest time from the beginning was so dense when its slowly matured in the cold vacuum the newer environment slowly ctreatec it to explode. Essentially we can look at the earliest galaxies as embryus or pods round shape in nature that like the atomic molecular structure inside an atom that are also rounded by nature evolve and were shaped in the same manner. All the galaxies were formed in this same manner. Galxies can be said to be the second nature of the universe - from the earlier big bang singularity.
   As the galaxies lay amidst empty space spins not because they lie on axis on the spread of a evolve bubble or balloon but because a conformative kinetic energy current lays created by the multiple chunks or galaxies that form a 360* degree pool by which the positive material that exist in the matter as energy is directly pushing away from each one away from each other directed through the galactic bottom side of the round bubble passing through the empty space realm or 360* degree bubble connecting not a mass energy but a kinetic mass effect. All matter existing in the universe all formed from the same deity all at the same time and is all made from ther same stuff. It is all positive as a singularity formed by the big bang event whereas the rippling sea all matter resides on is also positive forming a repulsive gravity force that is universe. Everything spins and thats how it is.
   Because of ths analogy negative only exist between molecules. Empty space known as Dirac's Sea is a positive deity the same as matter itself. In the furnurse where all matter molded  and shaped into where matter reacts as a negative response it is essentially positive. In such a theory you can see how the cosmos exist as a weightless environment. Beginning with weightlessness the totality of all space that exist as a cosmos a repulsive pushing away force relative to attraction GRAVITY  acts relative to a repulsive force which is a dominion environment in all space.
   Reviewing earth gravity is it attraction or free fall? This is where science becomes riddled with confusion. Attraction with magnetism and free fall as a attraction force. It can't be both. Or could it be? If an object is in freefall its not attraction or attracted to the bottom surface it is falling at a specific rate of speed not velocity. Think about it?
   Is it attraction (free fall) or a repulsive force activity coming from under the object mass - not above it. Free fall gaining velocity (9.8 m/s) or attraction gaining a specific speed and staying at that velocity. Pizzling isnt it. As attraction does gravity act like a magnetic controlling free fall at a certain rate of speed? I dont beleive this phenomenon? Do you?
  Gravity is repuslice acting from the dominate mass at the bottom where it falls towards and is not riddled with the force of magneism being the gravity force anomally. If the theory of gravity (earth) can be physically deciphered in mathematics (9.8m/s) answers the reason why the mass levitates at this velocity. (repulsion) controlled by the greater mass element.
 
   Want to learn more about the universe? Rod Kawecki explains the doubtful calamity one views in adavnce physics that started over a hundred years ago. He believes we are alot smarter now then we were than? He has written five books on space and the universe its beginning and its fall that will occur  in the future. Amongst these five books that illustrate faster than light analogy of the cosmos he will soon release a final version that explains the final results for faster than light space travel why time travel may not be at all possible and why a unlimited travel velocity may exist condamming the theory of relativity that asserts a universal speed limit. Why Albert Einstein is wrong about time and time travel he totality surrounds his theories on based on a lite speed particle.
 
    
  
  
  

Is Dark Energy Really 'Repulsive Gravity'?

Is Dark Energy Really 'Repulsive Gravity'?

                                                                                                                                           Rod Kawecki

₠²

        In Quanta Physics we want to look at
gravity as a repulsive force. Indifferent from relativity and Isaac Newton’s
gravity is due to attraction. The idea that things that act during free fall
are attracted to another object we can explain this with are sun and its nine
orbiting planets. Observation of this as an attraction force the earth acts in
free fall with the sun. It’s falling towards it. This can be observed in a few
different ways one that the earth is falling towards the sun. Two the earth is
being attracted to the sun due to the suns greater energy and three that it’s
the earth’s physical weight that due to the universe's tilt the earth falls
towards the sun because of its weight and attraction. But we want to look at
gravity as a repulsive force. A repulsive force means that in all the events I
just mentioned the earth is actually being pushed away from the sun. We look at
the idea in the first example showing that the earth is not being attracted to
the sun but is being pushed away - this example illustrates the earth is in
free fall in the direction of the sun because the sun's mass is so much greater
that the mass of the earth that it physically falls towards the sun but looking
at this action as a repulsion force we observe the earth being pushed away from
the sun because of its energy potential. The idea that the sun's energy mass is
so much greater than the earth’s that they repel each others energy which
creates a astronomical distance away from one another. Secondly, we observe the
earth in free fall not being attracted but pushed away from it. We can observe
this affect with all the other nine planets in the same way. That because all
positive energy repels it is due because they all formed from the same
singularity as well as they are all positive energy deities. The sun creates a
deep curvature in space that also according to relativity physics all celestial
spheres fall towards it. Even though this is true based on the curvature of the
sun laying deep in the fabric of space that all these nearby celestial s all
fall towards it but when we want to observe a force of gravitation we have to
look for the reason why. Why fall but don't crash. Basically we know the sun which is much larger than all the
nine planets that orbit around it causing them to fall in a direction towards
it we also discover that there is a subtle distance all the planets also orbit
around the sun at. A repulsion theory explains why they are set in an order.

     Looking at gravity as a repulsive force we
discover that the content of all the planets and their independent energy mass
and because they all retain a positive energy content that they are not
actually attracted to the sun but are kept each at a distance away from the sun
because of the amount of energy mass each of the planets retain as a whole that
they are being kept at a distance away from the sun. WE can also see that as
the distance gets further and further away in distance that this repulsion
energy that keeps the planets at a distance will also fade away and became
fragile. We look at the solar system and observation of its planets all orbiting
the sun. A sun that's mass is thousands of times the size and mass of the other
nine planets. We see using Newton's law of gravity that we can physically
predict the distance the planets orbit at a distance from the sun by
calculating the planets mass. We look at the repulsive force theory with
earth’s surface deities and calculate the same distance. That the surface
objects in free fall are being pushed away due to the earth's energy content
that is much greater than the falling surface objects doing so we calculate the
distance at 9.8 meters a second for all the objects.

     We observe free fall as a means to
calculate a velocity and distance of an object in relationship with other
positively charged entities. Relativity has shown how space itself tells matter
what to do whereas matter tells space to curve. This is also a repulsive
presentation called as an example Probe 'B" in modern physics
literature.  We could also see how space
is expanding and as a result is always in motion seems to me to be physically pushing
things along. 

     We look at the idea that gravity force is
an attractive force due to the direction of an objects free fall towards where
a lot of people seem to think that attraction is more like a magnetic force and
become confused. Using attraction as a force example for gravity in both a
planets force of gravity and gravity in space as a attraction does not allow a
reason for Newton's measurements for object free fall nor explain the reason
why. Looking at gravity as a repulsive force between the balances of masses
energy content allows a means to calculate the reason for the balance between
the two masses. We can look at this new ideas by using are earth moon for the
example. We have the earth’s moon orbiting earth at an angle - observing the
direction of free fall of the moon orbiting the earth as attraction in the free
fall we observe and ask the question of why the moon does not fall on the earth
it’s attracted towards. But if we look at this same activity with understand
that the reason the moon orbits earth is based on its potential energy. Whereas
same energies repel they are kept at a distance because of it. We also discover
that over time that are new theory also predicts a possible free fall collision
from its moon in the later future. Though it seems not safe to reason the
threat of an end it is more likely that we as earth beings alien to the future
cosmos it might be better to wisely research and calculate such ending events
that may occur in the celestial future.

IS IT TIME TRAVEL OR JUST A SPEED THEORY

₠²

The last Equation in town

" IS THE COSMIC JOURNEY TIME TRAVEL " 

OR JUST DEEP CELESTIAL SPEED

The Quanta Physics Gravitation Principle

        In Quanta Physics Theory we suggest the repulsion rather then attraction to look at gravity as a repulsive force. Indifferent from relativity and Isaac Newton’s gravity is due to attraction. The idea that things that act during free fall are attracted to another object we can explain this with are sun and its nine orbiting planets. Observation of this as an attraction force the earth acts in free fall with the sun. It’s falling towards it. This can be observed in a few different ways one that the earth is falling towards the sun. Two the earth is being attracted to the sun due to the suns greater energy and three that it’s the earth’s physical weight that due to the universe's tilt the earth falls towards the sun because of its weight and attraction. But we want to look at gravity as a repulsive force. A repulsive force means that in all the events I just mentioned the earth is actually being pushed away from the sun. We look at the idea in the first example showing that the earth is not being attracted to the sun but is being pushed away - this example illustrates the earth is in free fall in the direction of the sun because the sun's mass is so much greater that the mass of the earth that it physically falls towards the sun but looking at this action as a repulsion force we observe the earth being pushed away from the sun because of its energy potential. The idea that the sun's energy mass is so much greater than the earth’s that they repel each others energy which creates a astronomical distance away from one another. Secondly, we observe the earth in free fall not being attracted but pushed away from it. We can observe this affect with all the other nine planets in the same way. That because all positive energy repels it is due because they all formed from the same singularity as well as they are all positive energy deities. The sun creates a deep curvature in space that also according to relativity physics all celestial spheres fall towards it. Even though this is true based on the curvature of the sun laying deep in the fabric of space that all these nearby celestials all fall towards it but when we want to observe a force of gravitation we have to look for the reason why. Basically we the sun which is much larger than all the nine planets that orbit around it causing them to fall in a direction towards it we also discover that there is a subtle distance all the planets also orbit around the sun at.

     Looking at gravity as a repulsive force we discover that the content of all the planets and their independent energy mass and because they all retain a positive energy content that they are not actually attracted to the sun but are kept each at a distance away from the sun because of the amount of energy mass each of the planets retain as a whole that they are being kept at a distance away from the sun. We can also see that as the distance gets further and further away in distance that this repulsion energy that keeps the planets at a distance will also fade away and became fragile. We look at the solar system and observation of its planets all orbiting the sun. A sun that's mass is thousands of times the size and mass of the other nine planets. We see using Newton's law of gravity that we can physically predict the distance the planets orbit at a distance from the sun by calculating the planets mass. We look at the repulsive force theory with earth’s surface deities and calculate the same distance. That the surface objects in free fall are being pushed away due to the earth's energy content that is much greater than the falling surface objects doing so we calculate the distance at 9.8 meters a second for all the objects.

     We observe free fall as a means to calculate a velocity and distance of an object in relationship with other positively charged entities. Relativity has shown how space itself tells matter what to do whereas matter tells space to curve. This is also a repulsive presentation called as an example Probe 'B" in modern physics literature.  We could also see how space is expanding and as a result is always in motion seems to me to be physically pushing things along. 

     We look at the idea that gravity force is an attractive force due to the direction of an objects free fall towards where a lot of people seem to think that attraction is more like a magnetic force and become confused. Using attraction as a force example for gravity in both a planets force of gravity and gravity in space as a attraction does not allow a reason for Newton's measurements for object free fall nor explain the reason why. Looking at gravity as a repulsive force between the balances of masses energy content allows a means to calculate the reason for the balance between the two masses. We can look at this new ideas by using are earth moon for the example. We have the earth’s moon orbiting earth at an angle - observing the direction of free fall of the moon orbiting the earth as attraction in the free fall we observe and ask the question of why the moon does not fall on the earth it’s attracted towards. But if we look at this same activity with understand that the reason the moon orbits earth is based on its potential energy. Whereas same energies repel they are kept at a distance because of it. We also discover that over time that are new theory also predicts a possible free fall collision from its moon in the later future. Though it seems not safe to reason the threat of an end it is more likely that we as earth beings alien to the future cosmos it might be better to wisely research and calculate such ending events that may occur in the celestial future.

Celestial balance in space

Similar positive energy repel is the reason dark 

space is deemed negative

A SPEED WITHOUT LIMIT

Changes That Come to Light don’t always come to Mass

E=mc2 = 00.c2 = infinity

ASpeed Without Limit

      DENSITY of a field area of space is the place for the interacting energy source manipulates the rest mass of a moving object. Below is the density field energy of space beyond the planet sphere atmosphere and also is listed the energy of the earth's atmosphere field energy. Reviewing the difference between the listed two you’ll discover that the earth’s field density is measured at about half of the field energy of deep space. Also listed with the universe field equation is the vacuum density which is 10 -30 cm³. Together they show that earth’s atmosphere or gravity field its energy as a whole is half that of the universe vacuum density. The facts left behind to us show that an object able to travel at about the speed of light in earth’s gravity field measured against the universes’ field density enables the object or spacecraft to travel twice the difference shown in the figures of the energies between them. Earths field density in positive energy mass traveling close to light speed in the comparison illustrates that if it were traveling through the vacuum field attraction of the mass will measure zero without energy in the universe field zero point vacuum. The positive numbers are about half those of the negative numbers in the vacuum density which measures zero where energy masses are measured as weight increases measurable to the proportional weight energy of the mass - mass in vacuum measures zero due to the lack of energy in the vacuum field. The mathematics’ in this comparison are equal to the ability to travel at the speed of light in vacuum proportionate with its mass increasing due to acceleration but where the kinetic value the ship having zero mass in vacuum without a mass value the existence of kinetic energy increase renders with the ships ability to travel light speed. Where the ships mass is not measured due to the interacting of zero energy in the field - infinite mass due to acceleration in Einstein's universal constant to energy ceases to exist as well. In the comparison of numbers in field densities where there is no energy interaction between the space field and the ships acceleration is redirected towards Einstein infin9te mass theory. Since Einstein believed the space field to be static energy infinite mass is not reached yet the ships velocity and its ability to travel light speed increases its acceleration ability from the speed of light to twice that velocity simply based on the lack of energy in the vacuum. Even though Einstein uses the propaganda of 'light' in vacuum for his equations for infinite mass and its values LIGHT is not the subject we are speaking of 'MASS" instead that the changes come from. The ship then is able to travel 372,000 miles a second.

We research further in this theory about light speed and its components (₠²)

   We research farther observing the state of the universe and its expanding space pressure and outline a more valuable direction to correct the arithmetic in special relativity and review how the universe’s expansion has barrier to how fast a mass will travel through space also.

   In the arithmetic below we direct the value of the Hubble Recession approximately 45 miles per second per 3 million light years divide it with the full diameter of the universe at its event horizon or highest edge on the outside of the bubble divide this with 3 million light years and multiple that sum with 45 miles a second. Discovery of that sum of 450,000 miles per second in seconds with the speed of light and discover how fast space is at expansion at its extreme and outside edge = 372,000 m/s plus 78,000 m/second.

   We observe the swell of the space expansion is equal to just over twice light speed as shown in the other assignments also listed to be ‘The Swell’ meaning the pushing outwards of pressure of the bubble where the galaxies lay on the outer side of the bubble fabric surface.

   The fastest a ship can be accelerated or pushed at is 186,000 miles a second. Due to all other remedies acquired like the physical expansion of space the lack of energy in the vacuum and lack of mass increasing due to such energies in the space compartment theory add to the ships ability to forego its journey.

Travelable Speed Limit at the Universe's Fabric Edge

Listed:

 The density of the Universe is 9.9 x 10-30 g/cm³; light speed x 2 (plus zero 'o')

                        Earth   5.52 g/cm³.....light speeds

.........................................................................................................................................................

Travelable speed limit at universe's crest line edge

 The observable universe has a diameter of about:

 93 billion light years times pi

  279,000,000,000 light years   (@ pi)

       Space itself is pulling apart at the seams, expanding at a rate of 74.3 plus or minus 2.1 kilometers (46.2 plus or minus 1.3 miles) per second per megaparsec (a megaparsec is roughly 3 million light-years).

 279,000,000,000 light years

 3,000,000      light-years

----------------------------------

10,000 x 45 miles a sec = 450,000 miles a sec

(450,000 m/s) divided by L.S. = 372,000 m/s plus 78,000 m/s equals Speed without Limit

Equals: 44.7 miles per second every 3 million light-years

.........................................................................................................................................................

   Also a part to be recognized is "The Alcubierre Warp Drive" adding still more speed for the journey.

INERTIA:  A ship traveling in space builds its own inertia. The problem with inertia on earth in earth’s atmosphere and gravity field is weighed by the affects placed on an object by other forces like friction, energy, gravity, air and the weather. In space all these inertia affects don’t exist. Space is a vacuum. A wide vacuum and is made up of mostly empty space. Since the forces of planet masses are directed towards the planets center of mass the affects of inertia in space leaves open a wide empty space between the galaxies and planet systems.

    On earth it is these affects that create inertia on an object. Space in 1905 was thought to be static allowing it to have affects that would put a traveling object to become un-balanced therefore having the effect of inertia changing the objects direction.  It has been found that 98 % percent of space is empty of having such inertia affects and what has become known as micro-gravity has been replaced. We look at the statistics about inertia and discover that it is the ships center of mass as it traveling that initial inertia is created by its velocity. The greater the ships velocity the greater the inertia it creates putting other objects near it or close enough to nit to create a force that changes the objects travel direction therefore making it un-balanced.

   Most physicists will say that all the effects of relativity and spacetime are the same as those on earth’s gravity but this is far from the truth. When we review a ships ability to travel close to the speed of light in space we find that weigh caused by inertia is minimal. But we can measure the balance between possible inertia disasters by measuring towards the center mass of the ships body and its area position amidst empty space to guide us through our journey.

GRAVITY:  We can review the affects of gravity in Newton’s theory with the foundation that an object has mass. His theory explains how a mass no matter its size free falls to the earths surface at a common velocity of 9.8 meters per second but what his theory doesn’t explain is why?

   We review Einstein’s theory on gravity and find that he explains the measure of free fall with its mass energy. He explains how its an object energy of its mass that when it falls is coordinated with the energy of the earths energy is the reason it free falls at 9.8 meters a second. Yet still – even the great theory of Einstein’s gravity on earth does not explain why an object free falls at 9.8 meters a second.

   We continue to look for reasons these forces math equations measure in the manner they resolve to measure but without question. The question of why an object free falls towards the planet’s surface at a specific velocity. Rodney Kawecki has reviewed these specifications and has come up with why surface masses all fall at the same state of velocity 9.8 meters a second. His explanation is as following:

   We have to look at the force of gravity as a repulsive force as many physicists have over the decades. By doing this we put the theory of planetary gravity in a reverse position. An objects free falls towards the planet’s surface due to its weight as it falls its energy as Einstein predicts becomes in the position to be justified and measurable with the planets mass energy as relativity says it does. The initial difference is as the object free falls it gets heavier and heavier till it reaches the surface but as it falls its energy mass is recalculated by the presets of the planets energy and no matter the objects mass size they all fall at a specific speed 9.8 meters a second. If we look at this process of free fall as a repulsive source we discover that the planets energy is actually pushing the falling objects mass away from it but as it the object falls it gets heavier and heavier as it falls. The mass energy of the free fall object is counter played by the earths energy making all matter falling at the same rate of speed. But as the objects fall the pushing away force or freedom a planets mass is given due to the constant expansion of the universe as a whole allow the space in the earth’s atmosphere to push against the free fall of the objects energy mass making it fall at a specific velocity.  As we review this definition for gravity as a repulsive force we are able to render where and how surface masses no matter their size all fall to the surface at a specific rate of speed 9.8 meters a second per second.

   Relativity calculates the speed of inertia of any massive object to be the speed of light. What this says is that space like earth’s atmosphere is embodied as a whole as an equilibrium which as such anything in its space has a limited velocity. A distance so small as a planet’s atmosphere yet so great as a universe’s equilibrium realm yet the velocity of light is able in both places. In the earths atmosphere it is the gravity force that entangles how fast an object might travel yet in space an expanding space of 45 miles a second per 3 million light years distance is also limited by the speed of this light.  The calculations earlier illustrate the difference in speeds a ship might travel having the ability to do so – based on light speed in space due to the expansion of the field an affect that for all reason affects everything existing in the realm of space as a whole.

     We reside outside the universe’s event horizon as space expands making the distance between galaxies farther and farther away every second.  Galactic matter as such grows deeper and deeper into the vacuum of that space. It is essential that we travel at a velocity that would otherwise keep us from getting away from a condition of space that at its wits gets farther and farther away from us. In this book I have re designed everything available on the web and other places that explain the misfortune of an expanding universe that continually gets bigger and have come up with what I believed to be the best way from which the strength it might take to bend space it is easier to manage a star Ship with engines built that can travel the distance and have the capacity to do so.

₠²

  THE UNIFIED FIELD THEORY OF DREAMS

By: Rodney Kawecki ₠

2015.02.08

 The KINETIC universe

The smallest equation in the world Of physics for mass and energy is   ‘ ₠² ‘

     People look at the theory of gravity with the idea that it’s an attraction force. That things fall to the ground because of attraction but that’s the farthest answer to the question. Objects fall to the ground not due to attraction but because of their initial weight. In physics weight has no definition except of a weight scale. The furthest is from the truth about gravity. It is not an attraction force. We observe earth with the sun and discover the depth of the sun makes earth seem to be falling towards the sun but gravity tells us it attracted. Gravity is characterized by the un-balance of two masses at a distance.  The force of attraction between all masses in the universe; especially the attraction of the earth's mass for bodies near its surface; "the more remote the body the less the gravity" attractive force - the force by which one object attracts another is defined by the larger size mass with Coulomb's law of electrical forces tendency in counterbalance with gravitational free fall attraction towards the Sun. The sun rotates and its nine adjoining planets follow.

    When dropped an object falls at a specific speed due to its energy content. All objects fall at that same rate because they are in comparison with the big bad planets energy. Attraction as a gravity force means that the object is in attraction to the earth’s energy is the reason it falls but that’s furthest from the truth. As a universal medium gravity is a repulsive force meaning as a whole gravity in the universe and the space it resides with reference to the 96 percent called empty space gravity is a pushing force specifically due to the expansion of the universe as a whole. When we review gravity within the earth’s atmosphere we discover that that field retains energy in it energy that comes from the planet as a whole not the universe as a whole so the specifics to that field in the earth’s atmosphere changes the density of the field and becomes a positive energy field. The field objects in that field respond to that energy but only in that field and fields of other planets are different as well. What happens is the empty repulsive field of universal space is changed with the added energy from the planet. The activity or interaction in that field is what measures the difference of a repulsive gravity forces which is universal and the earth’s gravity field which are planetary but nothing really changes. The gravity force is still repulsive it is neither attractive due to the present energy from the planet but is the ground force of all space. Where earth’s gravity force is a field with disturbances friction, energy air magnetism and the like the interstellar field is neither it is empty of such disturbances only that these disturbances might arrive in the path of our ship’s journey.  Even though the space field is a field that lays above the pressure that expands it – this interstellar space field is grounded by its surface equivalencies’ and like the pressure that expands its field matter is repulsively pushed outwards and away as a accumulation of all the galactic matter that exist in it. All the matter that exist in it like water lays in a pond of water it is put into spin as it presses against the dark fabric it lays upon and put into celestial orbit by the free fall depths of a dominion star that forms an un-balance of the system of stars that act in its axis capture. One dominion system of stars does not tumble or fall into another galactic or solar system except possibly by the collapse of its sun where the planets of the collapse celestial would gain leverage and break away from the alignment would cause a celestial miscarriage of any celestial system. If space laying at the surface of the celestial bubble were not weightless measurable to a zero point vacuum galaxies laying at the bottom of the universe would fall like one drops an apple from its hand it is for this reason that at the center of all matter and that includes the material universe as well must proclaim a central nucleus amidst the mid darkness of its three dimensional spectrum. Like the sun keeps its nine planets in orbitration a universe nucleus keeps all the matter in its system held in sequence gravity keeps the galaxies from collision and space puts them in spin nothing really changes.  Like atoms observed through microscopes particles that travel at speeds close to the kinetic of light like observations measured through the Hubble telescope the galaxies are being pushed at this same velocity bound by the same laws.

Hubble Space Phenomena

                                                           

                                                      

Space moves first due to Expansion                                                                                   KAWECKI SPACE EXPANSION ₠²

Where can we possibly find the particle that all physicists are looking for having to do with gravity? Can it be where space interacts in the fabric itself?

The Quanta Physics How to Travel Faster then Light Summary

Albert Einstein asserted that gravity in space is traveling at the speed of light

by: Rodney Kawecki 2015.0204

Newton's Second Law

    In any other case the total kinetic energy has a non-zero minimum. We observe the cosmos and the galaxies moving away from us – is the bullet passing an observer has kinetic energy in the reference frame of this observer. The same bullet is stationary from the point of view of an observer moving with the same velocity as the bullet, and so has zero kinetic energy.  The universe surpasses itself with a cosmological constant of zero gravity. Since the galaxies are moving away from each other , the observer from one of these galaxies traveling towards another gains no kinetic energy.

   Where on a planet the kinetic potential of energy loss is contradicted by its mass energy potential, in space is over laced as a kinetic energy source for gain. The interacting between mass potential at rest and kinetic mass gain are contradicted by the potential mass equaling c and its interacting kinetic values equal to c where the loss is between the interaction is measurable at r which is its gravity.(without reference to speed) The ship accelerates gaining acceleration in a field that is already moving at light speed. He accelerates with a rest mass energy conservation measuring zero but having the potential of c energy already enabling him to travel close to the speed of light racing with the force gravity is traveling before any kinetic energy over exceeds him balancing with his ship’s center of mass.  

Wanna' Go..................

Pushing Mass to Travel Faster than Light

BY: RODNEY KAWECKI 2015

Pushing Mass to Travel Faster than Light

Particle Physics Please …..the confusion is worldwide

The nature of testing whether or not a mass can physically withstand traveling at speeds faster than light have totally been underwritten by modern physics based on the natural exhibit of a singular particle and its spin.

In what Kawecki calls " The Quantum Light Speed Theory'  is how he will explain in detail the best evidence to superluminal space travel theory obtainable in today's modern physics history that shows physical evidence to his hypothesis he was led to be a part of in "DIRAC'S SEA". Dirac’s Sea is observing space as a three dimensional realm in the same way we take for granite our planets ocean. From head to toe space also has a surface like are oceans and is a place which the planets above reside.

Research on the possibility of faster than light space travel can well be addressed with the work of Paul Dirac physicists at Cambridge University in 1925 Dirac's work on anti-particle behavior at this time show that what is called THE DIRAC SEA equations act relative to the effects of an external force as Albert Einstein's work on relativity and light speed doctrine this external force of gravitation acting on all particles and matter on this planet.

Dirac's work mentioned that when the positive energy electron particle is in a ZPE state or field vacuum it resides at rest. This evidence refers back into the Quanta Physics Study and chapter of Quantum Light Speed Hypothesis in the manner that infers to the Interstellar space field realm. Dirac's hypothesis on particle behavior and referring to the activity of electrons and the electron antiparticle raises the issue to faster than light speed possibilities that in Quantum Light Speed Theory infer the possibilities to time travel within the standard model. Time travel is a full explanation of Albert Einstein and his special theory of relativity but doesn't infer until after light velocity is engaged.

The PE electron (positive electron) is in its lowest energy state when it is not moving. At this point a PE electron has only rest mass energy equal to mc². The faster the PE electron moves the more energy it acquires over and above its rest mass. Momentum or velocity of the electron while at rest retains an energy mass relative to the energy around inferred upon as gravity even though it doesn't move. As a PE electron's momentum increases it moves up the energy ladder this kinetic raise in its energy comes from its surrounding space. On earth the energy of earth’s gravity field force even at rest measures G=6.67428 x 10-11 m3/kg s2.

The Energy Interactions and Behaviors between Particles and their Mass

EARTH

G=6.67428 x 10-11 m3/kg s2.

Where F is the force, m1 and m2 are the masses of the objects interacting with G {G=6.67428 x 10-11 m3/kg s2.}, r is the distance between the centers of the masses and G is the gravitational constant.

F=G m1/m2/r2

F=G (mass + ke / r) center of the two masses) interaction behaviors.

In 1905, Albert Einstein believed the universe cosmogony was static.

SPACE

G=zero

Where F is the force, m1 and m2 are the masses of the objects interacting with G {G=zero}, r is the distance between the centers of the masses and G is the gravitational constant.

F=m1(-m2)r2

E=m1(-m2)r2

F is the force. m1 is the mass of the object (plural) -m2 interacting with G {G=zero}, r is the distance between the centers of the masses.

Note: this only applies to objects with rest mass. Anything with 0 mass can travel at light speed easily.

 Frame of reference

The speed, and thus the kinetic energy of a single object is frame-dependent (relative): it can take any non-negative value, by choosing a suitable reference frame.  For example, a bullet passing an observer has kinetic energy in the reference frame of this observer. The same bullet is stationary from the point of view of an observer moving with the same velocity as the bullet, and so has zero kinetic energy.  

By contrast, the total kinetic energy of a system of objects cannot be reduced to zero by any suitable choice of the inertial reference frame, unless all the objects have the same velocity meaning that if the speed of gravity is measured to be traveling at the speed of light there can exist no initial reference frame by which a kinetic value can be uniformed since in space all the objects in the gravity all have the same initial velocity.

. It is assumed that the body starts with no kinetic energy when it is at rest (motionless). In space since the momentum of the object is not measured as a negative respond on the body but measures a positive proportionate free fall motion in space the rigid body’s gain of kinetic energy is subtracted in the balance. the instantaneous free fall gain expansion acceleration enforced by the objects propulsion force of acceleration in a zero point reference frame. In such a case there exist a mass and kinetic energy balance.

 In any other case the total kinetic energy has a non-zero minimum. We observe the cosmos and the galaxies moving away from us – is the bullet passing an observer has kinetic energy in the reference frame of this observer. The same bullet is stationary from the point of view of an observer moving with the same velocity as the bullet, and so has zero kinetic energy.  The universe surpasses itself with a cosmological constant of zero gravity. Since the galaxies are moving away from each other , the observer from one of these galaxies traveling towards another gains no kinetic energy.

Where on a planet the kinetic potential of energy loss is contradicted by its mass energy potential, in space is over laced as a kinetic energy source for gain. The interacting between mass potential at rest and kinetic mass gain are contradicted by the potential mass equaling c and its interacting kinetic values equal to c where the loss is between the interaction is measureable at r which is its gravity.(without reference to speed) The ship accelerates gaining acceleration in a field that is already moving at light speed. He accelerates with a rest mass energy conservation measuring zero but having the potential of c energy already enabling him to travel close to the speed of light before any kinetic energy over exceeds him balancing with his ship’s center of mass. 

It is assumed that the body starts with no kinetic energy when it is at rest (motionless) in space F=G m¹/m²/r³. Potential energy m¹ having the potential of c¹, where m² as a source of energy also has potential energy in equal with c¹, where r is zero.  Force drive kinetic energy is a source of expansion gained by the displacement of G, to be driven is balanced based on negative g equals c².  C is used for the speed of waves in any material medium, and c0 for the speed of light in vacuum.[8] According to special relativity, c is the maximum speed at which all matter and information in the universe can travel. It is the speed at which all massless particles and changes of the associated fields (including electromagnetic radiation such as light and gravitational waves) travel in vacuum. An object will continue moving at its current velocity until some force causes its speed or direction to change.

In mathematics, two variables are proportional if a change in one is always accompanied by a change in the other, and if the changes are always related by use of a constant multiplier. The constant is called the coefficient of proportionality or proportionality constant.

If one variable is always the product of the other and a constant, the two are said to be directly proportional. x and y are directly proportional if the ratio \tfrac yx is constant.

If the product of the two variables is always equal to a constant, the two are said to be inversely proportional. x and y are inversely proportional if the product xy is constant.

State of least energy'

A key concept is the center of gravity of a body at rest: it represents an imaginary point at which all the mass of a body resides. The position of the point relative to the foundations on which a body lies determines its stability in response to external forces. If the center of gravity exists outside the foundations, then the body is unstable because there is torque acting: any small disturbance will cause the body to fall or topple. If the center of gravity exists within the foundations, the body is stable since no net torque acts on the body. If the center of gravity coincides with the foundations, then the body is said to be metastable.

In physics, the line of action of a force F is a geometric representation of how the force is applied. It is the line through the point at which the force is applied in the same direction as the vector F→.

The concept is essential, for instance, for understanding the net effect of multiple forces applied to a body. As an example, if two forces of equal magnitude act upon a rigid body along the same line of action but in opposite directions, then they have no net effect—loosely speaking, they cancel one another out.

 The kinetic energy of a non-rotating object of mass m traveling at a speed v is ½mv².

.In physics, a force is said to do work if, when acting on a body, there is a displacement of the point of application in the direction of the force. For example, when a ball is held above the ground and then dropped, the work done on the ball as it falls is equal to the weight of the ball (a force)

the kinetic energy of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its motion.

Where physics defused the definition of inertia to include being inside the matter doing the work. For instance, a ship's engines and their propulsion value are parts of the body therefore do not apply as a kinetic force.

 It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity. Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes. The orbit kinetic and potential energy are exchanged; kinetic energy is greatest and potential energy lowest at closest approach to the earth or other massive body, while potential energy is greatest and kinetic energy the lowest at maximum distance. Without loss or gain, however, the sum of the kinetic and potential energy remains constant unless effected by G.

Mass due to acceleration: v

Ma=vE

Particle physics please

“There exists no line of appointment that says that a piece of matter, a mass or even a particle cannot be pushed to travel faster than the speed of light”.

When a NE electron (negative electron) is not moving, it resides in its highest energy state with rest mass equal to -mc². Presumably, a particle with negative mass would fall up in a gravity field, but no such particle has ever been observed. As an NE electron moves faster, it actually loses energy and moves down on the energy ladder. Observing NE electron particle activity does not explain adding the force of propulsion to ad acceleration.

 To try and explain FTL theory the NE particle must retain an acceleration force behind it to conclude whether FTL of such a particle is possible. According to Relativity a particle cannot exceed the speed of light is a physical quantity from which FTL cannot be summed with because there exist no added force of acceleration. Rod Kawecki's theory on faster than light possibilities is based on whether or not a limited particle mass can be physically and separately using a propulsion force be accelerated to a velocity faster than light is the hypothesis not whether a material particle can exceed its natural velocity. {Q.L.S.T.( If you ad energy to a neg. electron it will slow down)}.

The negative electron can lose energy without limit continually increasing its velocity. {Q.L.S.T. (While its opposing particle the PE resides continually at rest during this time in phase)}. Because of electromagnetic positive and negative charge interaction, a electron by emitting a photon of light carries away the extent energy between any of the two acting state. This hypothesis in Quanta Physics asserts that while the particle mode is in negative state velocity that its counter-part PE electron resides at rest assert the emitting of positive energy flow. Referring to speed of light in vacuum..one can assert that matter or massive particle components "e" resume an at rest characteristic of the phase from phase one velocity. Also that superluminal space travel in vacuum space the NE electron asserts dominion stability when engaged against Quantum Light Speed Force...or engaged torque speed entailed in a zero point energy vacuum space field condition space. With these qualifications when we review what relativity asserts as infinite mass we can resort to this resolution of particle phase of the Quantum Light Speed Hypothesis explained here.

We must include the facts on infinite mass theory with negative vacuum space field theory to cancel out the infinite equation. We discover that the Quanta Physics Study illustrates an empty space circumstance field grade thereby not enabling the idea of a negative energy space type field space. The Dirac Sea scheme that the vacuum is empty of positive-energy electrons assumes to be correct allowing the resolution to a cosmic solar wind activity and sound effect in space but he also claims that the Interstellar space field is filled with an ocean of negative electrons.

This assertion in Quanta Physics refers back to the idea of what dark matter is or contains for its components. The idea that Kaweckian Space is a lot more less than even that as an equilibrium which negative density is the component in itself for a space field chemistry definition also shows that it is not a material quantity of the space field that is infinite but the dark matter it arose from and or by it. This idea also opens the realm to multiple disk type universes throughout infinity.

The Dirac examination on antiparticle and or particle behavior illustrates a particle that will travel through empty space at innumerous speeds that resume and are superluminal in characterization but can be accounted for when we include the negative counter velocity part space field density which in Quanta Physics is increased to a 10 -460 vacuum for the beginning of the universe's birth that is accounted by the torque velocity exclusion of gravitation in the E=Mc² equations and the negative density of the dark matter space field at the time of the big bang event.