THE POPCORN UNIVERSE
There's no such thing as gravity?
Even Einstein stated it once shown here ‘There’s no such
thing as gravity”. If there is - what is it?
THE POPCORN UNIVERSE and what
scientists don’t know about the universe and its origin...is here avialable for a new view about space. Physics argues that universe exist relative to an expanding bubble or balloon discovered in Hubble Theory. Albert Einstein and others rely mostly on the conclusion all matter resides inside this bubble. On the other hand...Rod Kawecki has developed a new theory but with the conclusion that all matter and life which also includes a black hole seed explained in this story matter and life exists outside the bubble and explains why..................
The universe is made up of massive galaxies of different
origins. There are no large broken pieces or chunks maximized as solid masses
but only galaxies making up different chemistry substances planets, stars and
gaseous type clusters and all different in some way possibly meaning they all are embryuses of a different growing seed. One does not need to go into the theory of gravitationally collapsed
objects or the evidence we have today, some impressive, some less convincing,
for black holes: one of some ten solar masses in the constellation Cygnus;
others in the range of a hundred or a thousand solar masses at the centers of
five of the star clusters in our galaxy; one about four million times as
massive as the sun at the center of the Milky Way; and one with a mass of about
five billion suns in the center of the galaxy M87.
How such a stellar BH? (cosmic seed)
could grow by 6-7 orders of magnitude in mass, in few hundred million years, is
another daunting task given the limits on accretion. The idea, that a set of
very specific physical conditions found only in the early Universe, In this
study we refer to a black hole with mass > 106M? as super massive.
Explaining the first super massive black
holes could have allowed for the formation of massive seed black holes with
masses in the range of 104-5 M, could be a potential solution to this problem
as the seed would now need to grow by only 3–4 orders of magnitude in mass to
attain super massive scales. Direct collapse (DC) channel of forming massive
seed black holes aim of this is to understand the plausibility of the set of
physical conditions required for direct collapse and its impact on the
evolution of the first galaxies.
A nick name theory addressed in The Quanta
Physics Theory applauds a new theory that besides the big bang theory the
universe was formed by the multiple collapse of the earliest spheres as in the
result of a black hole explanation here and nick named “The Popcorn Universe
Theory” and which addresses the probability that matter manifested through the
brethrens three-dimensional generalization surface of a rubber balloon as
prehistoric spheres (seeds) called ‘embryus’ procured out of the fabric surface
mass not as a single bang as in the big bang theory expalins but as in an multiple entre
of young spheres that manifested later exploded into the existing galaxies saw today the
beginning entre point from over 14.8 billion years ago. Each bang is a galaxy by itself. The emphasis is on understanding how
frequently do the conditions required for DC occur at z > 6 and not on the
actual formation process itself occurs it’s more analogical to understand that
the early prehistoric universe was by the independent formation of the galaxies
forming and not as a singularity theory.
The birth of the Milky Way comes from the
measurable collapse mass of a gigantic black hole one with a mass of about five
billion suns as the one in the center of the galaxy M87 is
evidence from relativity that the galaxy is the aftermath of a massive
collapsed deity. (Embryus) Black holes what are they? Where do they come from?
And what is their origin? To some it is thought to be what is called The Big Gun
a portal where matter arrived through the fabric of space the manifestation of
the cosmic egg to some. There exists no evidence on which way the black hole is
spinning whether inwards or outwards.
Assumed to come from a galactic collapse the portal is assuming matter
and energy towards it and not away from it. A collapse followed by a bang
allows matter to be formed creating dense matter.
A body's mass also determines the degree to
which it generates or is affected by a gravitational field. If a first body of
mass mA is placed at a distance r (center of mass to center of mass) from a
second body of mass mB, each body experiences an attractive force Fg =
GmAmB/r2, where G = 6.67×10−11 N kg−2 m2 is the "universal gravitational
constant" that all matter is limited by the speed of light even if it is mass and not light is the mathematical assumption. This is sometimes referred to as gravitational mass. The
problem with relativity is the assumptions it makes. It mathematically
determines a sum from separate masses it calculates based on E=mc2. The problem
there is no way to physically test these sums. The reason I say this is because
an objects mass has two elements as a material matter deity. One is its
chemistry that defines its nature and secondly the energy equal to its mass as
a material element or substance. If the object is accelerated its mass changes
raising the sum of its energy but not its solidity as a piece of mass. For
instance an orange is an orange before it is thought as a generated energy of a
define substance. We observe matter as masses and energy that might well be the
facts but - whether adding speed to the mass increases its eternal energy as a
solid is still un-determined. The effect of energy traveling through a gravity
field always is changing as it travels. There is no real way to measure this
effect of momentum. In any effect we would be trying to measure the change of
energy as it moves which is said to be an impossible task. For these reasons
the basis of theoretical physics is undetermined as a science so it’s a theory.
In any event a moving mass its weight its mass its energy can not actually be
measured. Our orange travels through space which is measured to having zero
energy detectable in its area mass. Yet relativity raises the energy content of
the mass. In affect accelerating a mass or object is not changing its physical
mass or its energy especially in a zero point field - it is being pushed in the
same way the galaxies are being pushed due to the expansion of the field. The
orange are ship is being pushed by a propulsion force that doesn't change its
physical content or its energy it just pushes it through space. Any change in
its physical nature cannot be determined unless it is pushed into something in
its path some field deterrent no matter what that changes its straight line of
direction.
The question here is why acceleration affects the energy content
especially only the energy content of a mass that is of its own nature and
origin. Why does an object slow during acceleration when it travels through the
earth’s gravity intent? Is it its weight or energy that is affected? This
notoriety has never been changed in physics. Weight or energy? Or both or nether? Rod Kawecki has open the
door way to this phenomena. In his book he opens the doorway in Isaac Newton's
theory on gravity and attraction. He has opened a new view for the theory of
gravitation that fills pieces never answered earlier in the century. Science
can be slowed from advancing when looking at something in the wrong way.
Kawecki has reviewed the facts that lay upon the affects gravity has or is
there no such thing as gravity?
Warp velocities
What sort of technology is necessary to travel faster than light at a
velocity that allows traveling through space to planets and stars
astronomically too far to travel otherwise. Why is this necessary? The reason
is astronomical distances. In Quanta Physics Theory the fastest a ship might
travel without any barriers that cause time dilation or time travel to occur.
This velocity in Quanta Physics is called " Instantaneous Time
Travel" It has little to nothing to do with time travel but is the fastest
any ship might travel anywhere and at anytime throughout the cosmos.
IN NO TIME AT ALL
Instantaneous Space Travel
is not specifically related to including time and can operate without it
The time it takes...Joe how long - I don't know maybe a half hour...........
What is time travel? Time travel is not
mythical. It doesn’t allow traveling through space by some unreasonable means
like – swirling through a tunnel made by a ship’s engineering. Nor is it
creating some doorway out from nothingness like what relativity calls a
wormhole. It means having the ability to
travel within normal means highly engineering having the amount of propulsion
energy or force to travel a distance through space at the greatest velocity. In
relativity Albert Einstein made a statement that one single second of time
governs how fast one can travel through space and how light manifests the
doorway from a local present time and location and another traveling through
time past, present or future. His special theory of relativity is a fine and
un-determined arithmetic engineering diagram for such time what he calls time
travel. His theory is measured by the
boundaries light exist with as a defined element called ‘quanta’. On second of time on the clock is the
coordinated measuring system for which time travel works as a single second
engineering.
Instantaneous space travel is the speed of
the vessel measured by parts smaller than the original second hand of the clock
it doesn’t stop there as special relativity makes the judgment. Where relativity
designed its speed limit with a single full second of time measured by a clock
Instantaneous time travel takes into the parts of a second possibly based on
tenths units’ or parts of a second measurement on a passing clock. Time does not stop or slow down it is a
mechanism of measurement and doesn’t connect as a final dimension as relativity
claims it does. These smaller units are taken into consideration. Since the
basis for space travel has been formulated by relativity to measure space
travel weighed by seconds on the clock its more easily to design the
explanation for a faster velocity to measure within these components.
Instantaneous space travel is devised as traveling through space in
parts of a second. We travel at the greatest speed at nine tenths of a full
second of time. The faster we travel at light speed each units within a seconds
parts let’s say one tenth is measured as a speed of light. Of course than two
tenths means twice light speed and so on until we reach nine tenths of a second.
Partly traveling through space at twice the speed of light is measured again
with the vacuum equilibrium being accounted for. Measurements of relativity
have used light speed to accord with gravitation of the earth’s planet energy
saying that the effects of time dilation, friction, surface energies are taken
into consideration which makes traveling faster than light impossible. An
object traveling within the planet’s atmosphere its gravity is subject to being
affected and slowed by its gravity. The limit of course is the speed of light.
But is all that really true?
We look at Einstein's barriers he puts on the speed of light and
discover that space outside the planet’s atmosphere retains no real energy that
would cause the planetary affects gravity has on its surface objects. In space
which is a vacuum such effects cease to exist as a result the speed of light in
vacuum for a mass vessel - is not limited taking the Einstein limit into
consideration in such a zero point energy affect field space lacking the
gravitational defects Earth has - a massive vessel can travel twice light speed
to the least of it. I will explain further on the point of velocity and limits
and barriers more lately. So according
to the results of relativity as ship in space can travel twice the speed of
light. Another exception to the barrier is in the special theory of relativity
Einstein is talking about LIGHT and light impulse communication - not actually
on the sources for a massive vessel as he has in special relativity. You could
say that 'mass' is a missing equation in his theories.
We have raised the speed limit for are vessel to twice light velocity
based on the factors above. But let’s go further and search for reasons why
Einstein's speed limits do not apply? The idea is that space as a vacuum is
deep very deep the deeper the vacuum the deeper its level. Let’s take into
consideration by looking at the size masses of the planets and even further
into the tension of the vacuum and its hold of a galaxy? How much does a galaxy
weigh? Comparing a star ship and its weight and energy against that of a galaxy
and what - the difference is huge? So I raise the question? How deep is the
zero point energetic vacuums"? Are vessels looks the size of a flea's
piece of dist on its shoulder - the vessel is small. I watched a movie called
The Shrinking Man ". In the movie the man shrunk and continued to shrink
all through the movie. Finally he reached a point where he didn’t need food to
live on. He became so small - the pieces he might try and eat were also so
small - well finally he no longer needs food to survive.
We look at are star ship and it is small we approach a planet through
the galaxies planetary debris. The space field we travel is so deep as a vacuum
are ship feels little to no affect of any existing energy - energy that like of
earth causes gravitational affects to slow it down. In space we are so small
traveling deep between the galactic debris that the stretch between its debris
makes traveling through its counterparts even a deeper place of travel.
Traveling through the empty space from deeper regions that divide the galaxies
in the vacuum are ship experiences almost null affect of energies that will slow
it down. It travels on a freedom space field grid. The only existing debris is
the fabric itself and the space between dark matter or dark energy and the
ships body. Physics has entitled that the fabric of space is positive in its
nature and is the reason dark energy pushes matter away from it as part of its
expansion. If it were completely subtle and didn’t expand its tension affect
would cause the planets and stars to spin harder than they do normally.
Everything in the universe would slow down is the only "gravity"
affect that exist in the remote cosmos.
We also reconsider the theory of relativity
with what is called “Entanglement".
Quantum entanglement is a physical
phenomenon that occurs when pairs or groups of particles are generated or
interact in ways such that the quantum state of each particle cannot be
described independently—instead, a quantum state may be given for the system as
a whole.
Measurements of physical properties such as
position, momentum, spin, polarization, etc. performed on entangled particles
are found to be appropriately correlated. For example, if a pair of particles
is generated in such a way that their total spin is known to be zero, and one
particle is found to have clockwise spin on a certain axis, then the spin of
the other particle, measured on the same axis, will be found to be
counterclockwise. Because of the nature of quantum measurement, however, this
behavior gives rise to effects that can appear paradoxical: any measurement of
a property of a particle can be seen as acting on that particle (e.g. by
collapsing a number of superposed states); and in the case of entangled
particles, such action must be on the entangled system as a whole. It thus
appears that one particle of an entangled pair "knows" what
measurement has been performed on the other, and with what outcome, even though
there is no known means for such information to be communicated between the
particles, which at the time of measurement may be separated by arbitrarily
large distances.
Such phenomena were the subject of a 1935 paper by Albert Einstein, Boris
Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, and several papers by Erwin Schrödinger shortly
thereafter, describing what came to be known as the EPR paradox. Einstein and
others considered such behavior to be impossible; as it violated the local
realist view of causality (Einstein referred to it as "spooky action at a
distance", and argued that the accepted formulation of quantum mechanics
must therefore be incomplete. Later, however, the counterintuitive predictions
of quantum mechanics were verified experimentally. Experiments have been
performed involving measuring the polarization or spin of entangled particles
in different directions, which—by producing violations of Bell's
inequality—demonstrate statistically that the local realist view cannot be
correct. This has been shown to occur even when the measurements are performed
more quickly than light could travel between the sites of measurement: there is
no light speed or slower influence that can pass between the entangled
particles. Recent experiments have measured entangled particles within less
than one one-hundredth of a percent of the light travel time between them.
According to the formalism of quantum theory, the effect of measurement happens
instantly. Einstein and others considered such behavior to be impossible, as it
violated the local realist view of causality (Einstein referred to it as
"spooky action at a distance"), and argued that the accepted
formulation of quantum mechanics must therefore was incomplete.
Spooky at a distance" opens the
doorway to faster than light velocity theories. It is hard for me except that
the travel rate of speed can be based physically on a single second of time.
Even the clocks of today show units smaller than a single second of time. I hope
you understand where I am going with this? I don’t think cosmos space travel
can be based on something so small as a single second of time. We arrive to the
components that agree with faster than light space travel. Even though these
particles assert and measure a velocity faster than light and seem to be
instantaneous activities Measuring the time units involved with the velocity
they occur at is far more than a single second of time as the Einstein speed
limit claims there has to be something more.
Warp drive velocity in Star Trek
is generally expressed in "warp factor" units, which—according to the
Star Trek Technical Manuals—correspond to the magnitude of the warp field.
Achieving warp factor 1 is equal to breaking the light barrier, while the actual
velocity corresponding to higher factors is determined using an ambiguous
formula. Several episodes of the original series placed the Enterprise in peril
by having it travel at high warp factors;
warp factors are converted to multiples of c with the cubic function v =
w3c, where w is the warp factor, v is the velocity, and c is the speed of
light. Accordingly, "warp 1" is equivalent to the speed of light,
"warp 2" is 8 times the speed of light, "warp 3" is 27
times the speed of light, etc. for warp factors 1 through 9, v = w10/3c. In the
half-open interval from warp 9 to warp 10, the exponent of w increases toward
infinity.
There is no exact formula for this interval because the quoted
velocities are based on a hand-drawn curve; what can be said is that at
velocities greater than warp 9, the form of the warp function changes because
of an increase in the exponent of the warp factor w. Due to the resultant
increase in the derivative, even minor changes in the warp factor eventually
correspond to a greater than exponential change in velocity.
Exact velocities were given in a few
episodes, one being "Relativity", at warp factor 9.975. Voyager was
about 70,000 light-years away from home, and crew would often use "75
years" as the time it would take to get back home at top speed. This means
the Voyager series used the old method of Warp calculation. 70,000/9.9753 is
roughly 70.5 years. If delays for refueling, repair, restocking, and downtime
are considered, 75 years is a logical rounding.
As a
method of time travel while the actual procedure is intentionally obscure, it
involved traveling at a high warp velocity (depicted in Star Trek IV: The
Voyage Home is more than warp 9.8) in the direction of a star, on a precisely
calculated "slingshot" path; if successful, the ship is caused to
travel to a desired point, past or future.
The
warp factor required for "time warp" is given the name "light
speed breakaway factor". The term "time warp" was first used in
"The Naked Time" (1966) when a previously untried cold-start intermix
of matter and antimatter threw the Enterprise back three days in time. The term
was later used in Star Trek IV in describing the slingshot effect. The
technique was mentioned as a viable method of time travel.
This 'slingshot' effect has been explored in theoretical physics: it is
hypothetically possible to slingshot oneself 'around' the event horizon of a
black hole. The result of such a maneuver would cause time to pass at a slower
rate for the ship near the event horizon relative to the rest of the outside
universe. Such a journey would be a trip into the future — the craft would have
merely 'fast forwarded'. It is not possible to travel into the past with this
method.
Referred to as a warp core it is a
fictional reactor that taps the energy released in a matter-antimatter
annihilation to provide the energy necessary to power a starship's warp drive,
allowing faster-than-light travel. Starship warp cores generally also serve as power
plants for other primary ship systems.
When matter and antimatter come into
contact, they annihilate — both matter and antimatter are converted directly
and entirely into enormous quantities of energy, in the form of sub-nuclear
particles and electromagnetic radiation (specifically, mesons and gamma rays).
In the Star Trek universe, fictional "dilithium crystals" are used to
regulate this reaction. These crystals are described as being non-reactive to
anti-matter when bombarded with high levels of radiation.
The technology for instantaneous space
travel is afar distance in the future to even think about it is science fiction
but the information for such activity is
there for a theory. The discovery for what dark matter dark energy really is as
an element is short to be reckoned. The reach of such technology is short
beginnings for a deeper understanding about are universe then we periodically
have.
Quanta Physics Theory has based its analogy on relativity that seems
today to be blocked by a positive ground space field grid. We cant travel away
from it and neither through it as Einstein believes in black hole white
wormhole theories. Commonly it is my belief that future space travel technology
should be based on how empty the space field really is. Not the fabric the
galaxies lay abroad but the emptiness that allows distant travel. So I question
Einstein with ' what is gravity" the fabric all matter realigns with as a
tension core or “the free space above it? As the universe expands so do all the
galaxies align themselves pressing its tension it exist with molding a
connection between a ground and object. All the space beyond this parade of celestials
seems to me as endless or something that might be curved by something else
possibly another universe or even tread of material cosmology matter having
ascended by another already collapsed bubble?
Under the special theory of relativity, a
particle (that has rest mass) with subluminal velocity needs infinite energy to
accelerate to the speed of light, although special relativity does not forbid
the existence of particles that travel faster than light at all times. It has been observed that Einstein's theory
for infinite mass is measured with the presence of external energy such as in
Earth's gravity field that acts to change the rest mass of the particle.
Whereas there exist no such energy that acts on the particle no such infinite
mass increase of the particles rest frame is engaged. Space is just such a
non-energetic field.
A 2008 quantum physics experiment also
performed by Nicolas Gisin and his colleagues in Geneva, Switzerland has
determined that in any hypothetical non-local hidden-variables theory the speed
of the quantum non-local connection (what Einstein called "spooky action
at a distance") is at least 10,000 times the speed of light.
Space itself is pulling apart at the
seams, expanding at a rate of 74.3 plus or minus 2.1 kilometers (46.2 plus or
minus 1.3 miles) per second per megaparsec (a megaparsec is roughly 3 million
light-years).
279,000,000,000 light years
3,000,000
light-years
-------------------------
10,000 x 45 miles a sec = 450,000
miles a sec
(450,000 m/s) divided by L.S. =
372,000 m/s plus 78,000 m/s equals Speed without Limit
Equals: 44.7 miles per second
every 3 million light-years
...............................
186,000 miles per second
18.5 miles per second.. Earth
Rotation
subjected
sum equals 1,000 gravi-tons (squared 1,000,000 g²) planet
mobility activity (also by pi) be it to include.
SPACE THE FINAL FRONTIER
Space travel seems science fiction with the
future terminology it is written with. I believe it was over whelm by Einstein
when he published his work of the special theory of relativity. It’s hard to physically make the jump from a
primitive presents in history and describe an over whelming future using high velocity
speed barriers as Einstein did. But yet again there just velocities – speed
coordinates that are deemed equations for fast travel through space. Space terminology is solely based on the
equations that describe the conditions their measured by. How fast a planet
orbits and how it orbits retain such extreme velocities compared with the
normal sense of the meaning seem ridicules.
This is a great problem they seem impossible. Not only not just
impossible because they include such great numbers but because they rely on
an engineering model that has to fit it. When
Albert Einstein first published the special theory of relativity was the actual
first attempt to engineer this reality model whereas Star Trek was the first real
movie. (to do so)
.jpg)
